Skip to main content
Crucible Care

Sample report using demo data. This preview shows the type of reporting Crucible Care can generate for a licensed facility — not outcomes from a real cohort.

Crucible Care

12-week outcomes report

Cedar Ridge Senior Living

Sample Cohort · Spring 2026January 13, 2026 — April 6, 2026

Residents
14
Attendance
87%
Completed program
13 / 14
Shifted to lower band
7

01

Executive summary

Over twelve weeks, the Cedar Ridge Senior Living cohort of 14 residents completed the Crucible Care program across three parallel tracks. Sessions ran twice weekly at 45 minutes each, led by the facility's activity team using the scripted Crucible Care protocol.

Aggregate fall-risk band distribution shifted from 5 residents in the elevated band at baseline to 2 at week 12, with 7 residents moving to a lower band across the cohort. Sit-to-stand, balance, and confidence measures all improved at the cohort-average level; per-resident detail follows.

The report is structured for facility leadership, family review, and surveyor reference. Per-resident pages are available in the licensed-portal version.

02

Cohort overview

What the program was and how it ran.

Residents enrolled
14
Program length
12 weeks · 24 sessions
Schedule
2× / week, 45 min
Tracks
Strength · Chair-Based · Balance
Assessment rounds
Baseline (Week 1) · Midpoint (Week 6) · Final (Week 12)
Delivered by
Facility activity team

03

Sample data

Assessment snapshot

Five standardized measures from CDC STEADI and the Rikli & Jones Senior Fitness Test, administered at baseline, midpoint, and final by the same staff member for comparability.

MeasureBaselineMidpointFinalChangeRisk threshold
30-Sec Sit-to-Stand8.1 reps9.4 reps10.8 reps+34%<8 = high risk
Timed Up & Go14.4 s12.9 s11.7 s−19%>14s = high risk
Single-Leg Balance6.2 s7.5 s8.8 s+41%<5s = high risk
Grip Strength48.3 lbs51.2 lbs53.1 lbs+10%Age/sex-normed
Confidence Score5.4 / 106.9 / 107.8 / 10+44%Self-reported

Numbers shown are cohort averages within published Senior Fitness Test and CDC STEADI norms. Per-resident scores appear on individual resident pages in the licensed-portal report.

05

Sample data

Participation summary

Attendance and completion are the leading indicators of program fit. Drop patterns are documented; participation under 70% triggers a chair-based variant review.

Overall attendance

87%

Across 24 sessions

Completed all 12 weeks

13 / 14

One scheduled drop

Sessions delivered

24 / 24

No cancellations

06

Sample data

Resident engagement highlights

De-identified sample residents — initials only — showing the kind of per-resident detail the licensed-portal report includes for every participant.

M.S.

Strength
ElevatedModerate

Sit-to-stand reps improved week over week. Confidence rating self-reported as higher by week 8.

R.K.

Strength
ModerateLow

Strong adherence — attended 23 of 24 sessions. TUG time inside CDC STEADI low-risk range by final assessment.

L.T.

Balance
ModerateLow

Single-leg balance hold improved across all three assessments. Family reports steadier morning routine.

J.A.

Chair-Based
ElevatedElevated

Maintained baseline band; participation consistent at 92%. Staff note: candidate for continued Chair-Based programming next cohort.

Sample residents only — initials and observations are illustrative. No identifying details or real testimonials are used. In the licensed portal, every resident has their own page with the full five-measure breakdown.

07

Sample data

Staff implementation notes

The activity team logs operational notes through the cohort. These are surfaced in the final report so leadership can see the implementation context behind the numbers.

  1. Week 3

    Moved two residents to the Chair-Based track after observing post-session fatigue patterns. Both reported feeling more confident at week 6 reassessment.

  2. Week 6

    Midpoint assessments completed in two days. Adjusted Tuesday session timing to avoid lunch overlap; attendance held above 90% through week 7.

  3. Week 10

    Added a second coaching cue for the heel-toe balance hold. Residents in the Balance track responded well; hold times improved through final assessment.

08

Next-step recommendations

What the report surfaces for facility leadership at week 12 — both for the residents who completed the cohort and for planning the next one.

  1. 1

    Continue Strength track for M.S., R.K., L.T.

    All three demonstrated consistent improvement across multiple measures. Same track for the next cohort, with movement progressions noted in their per-resident pages.

  2. 2

    Re-evaluate J.A. for continued Chair-Based programming

    Participation strong (92%), band held steady. A second cycle of Chair-Based with the same coach is the conservative next move.

  3. 3

    Onboard 4 new residents for the next cohort

    Cohort 2 capacity available. Recommend administrative intake screen for any resident currently using a walker or with a fall in the prior 6 months.

  4. 4

    Schedule next midpoint check at week 6

    Same five-measure battery, same administering staff member. Comparability is the point.

Your facility, real data

This is the kind of report your licensed cohort produces.

Same structure. Your facility name on the cover. Your residents’ data inside. Generated in the platform the week the cohort ends.

Book a free demo class →